LIED under oath: Wade’s cell phone records reveal “romantic relationship” with Willis started well before they initially claimed

03/04/2024 / By Belle Carter

A recent bombshell report is now proving that Fulton County District Attorney (DA) Fani Willis has just perjured herself in court as the lawyers for former President Donald Trump were able to obtain, by subpoena to AT&T, her former lover Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade’s cell phone records from Jan. 1 through Nov. 30, 2021, wherein they found that the “romantic relationship” started even before 2022.

In a February 2, 2022 filing, Willis submitted Wade’s affidavit to the Court which claimed that “In 2022, District Attorney Willis and I developed a personal relationship.” DA Willis and Wade both testified that the relationship started sometime in early 2022.

In a filing today from Trump’s legal counsel, it was indicated that the relationship was already romantic well before Wade’s November 1, 2021 appointment by Willis as a special prosecutor. Investigators found that Wade and Willis had over 2,000 voice calls and under 12,000 interactions exchanged during the said period.

The geolocation on the phone also indicated that Wade visited Willis’s condo unit at least 35 times and that he was not moving and “not in transit” whenever in the area. According to the report: On Nov. 29, 2021, “following a call from Ms. Willis at 11:32 p.m., while the call continued, [Wade’s] phone left the East Cobb area just after midnight and arrived within the geofence located on the Dogwood address [the condo] at 12:43 AM on November 30, 2021. The phone remained there until 4:55 a.m.” It was also revealed that on September 11, 2021, Wade went to the DA’s place at approximately 10:45 p.m. and left at 3:28 a.m. He arrived home at his Marietta residence at 4:05 a.m. and then texted Willis at 4:20 a.m.

A Technofog Substack entry pointed out that the said evidence would suffice to disqualify Willis from Trump’s case. For sure, the DA’s next testimony will be to further lie and claim that these are just work meetings. “The extensive communications between the two signal something more than what they described as a friendship. Combined with Wade appearing at her apartment for a few hours before heading home, this is definitive proof that their romantic relationship started long before what they told the Judge. “These records support the testimony of Robin Yeartie, Willis’ former friend who testified that there was no doubt the relationship started before Wade became special prosecutor. And they destroy the testimony from, and credibility of, Willis and Wade,” the newsletter said. “Perjury before the Court, by itself, would be sufficient for disqualification.” (Related: Fani Willis’ lawyer donated to anti-Trump propaganda pushers, National Pulse reports.)

The author also noted that disqualification in the case is not enough, these records should expose Willis and Wade for criminal charges, including perjury/false statements, depending on the prosecutor. “At a minimum, DA Willis and Wade face an increased potential for severe punishment from the Georgia Bar, whether suspension of their law licenses, disbarment, or other sanctions,” the article further indicated.

Wade’s divorce lawyer should testify to confirm the timeline of the relationship

As the hearing resumed Tuesday, Feb. 27, so the court could decide whether Willis should be disqualified from Trump’s election interference case, Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee announced that the former law partner of Wade, Terrence Bradley, will have to testify in court on his knowledge of the timeline of their relationship.

Defense counsel claims Bradley has direct knowledge that Willis and Wade’s relationship started before he was hired in the Trump case. The judge’s decision comes after an in-camera hearing Monday, which will be kept under seal, with Bradley and his lawyer, after the judge had previously said it appeared Bradley may have been misusing his attorney-client privilege. Bradley’s testimony could be damning for the two as McAfee has already heard testimony from a former friend and employee of Willis who said the romance began long before Willis hired Wade.

A second witness contradicting Willis and Wade could provide further evidence to support the defendant’s assertion that Willis and Wade lied under oath at the recent hearing. At the Feb. 15 hearing, attorneys for the DA, Wade and Bradley himself argued Bradley should not be compelled to testify. They said any knowledge Bradley had of the Willis-Wade romance was privileged because he served as Wade’s divorce attorney for a time.

Defense attorneys argued that Bradley had personal observations and other knowledge of the relationship that he did not gain as Wade’s attorney.

Head over to Deception.news for stories related to government officials lying to people due to conflict of interest.